I’ve been using Even G1 AR glasses for a little while now, mainly for translation and the teleprompter features in my work. They’ve been surprisingly helpful in the office, making things run a bit smoother. But when I first thought about buying them, I was a bit hesitant because they don’t have a camera. Most AR glasses on the market come with cameras, so I thought I might be missing out on something important. But after actually using G1, I’ve realized that for the tasks I need, the camera hasn’t been a big necessity. The features I use most, like directions or checking notes, don’t really need a camera. Of course, there are cases where a camera could add extra functionality, but so far, I haven’t really run into those situations. It makes me wonder, do we really need a camera in AR glasses? For my own use, it doesn’t seem like it. G1 works well without one, focusing on the features that matter most for productivity. That said, I can see how a camera might be useful for other applications. But I do have concerns that the camera on the glasses could pose privacy risks, so after weighing my own needs, I decided against choosing glasses with a camera. What do you all think, does a camera make or break your AR glasses experience?
I think it depends on the use case. For navigation and simple tasks, a camera isn’t essential. But for augmented reality experiences that require environmental interaction, it can be crucial.
I share your concerns about privacy. A camera could lead to unwanted surveillance. I prefer devices that prioritize user privacy over features.
Cameras enable a lot of cool features like object recognition and enhanced AR experiences. But if you’re using them for productivity, maybe it’s not as necessary.
For applications like remote assistance or interactive gaming, a camera is definitely a game changer. But for straightforward tasks, like you mentioned, it’s not always needed.